Identify the kind of help the player wants
A family may seek mentoring because the player lacks a place to ask detailed questions about games. Another player may want help turning scattered feedback into a clear focus. These needs are related, but they call for different conversations.
Before comparing options, ask the player what would make the experience useful. They might want to understand a new midfield role, discuss recurring decisions or become more comfortable evaluating their own footage. Write the answer in ordinary language. A defined purpose makes it easier to judge fit than a general hope that extra attention will produce better results.
Look for a relationship that welcomes explanation
A mentor should be able to make the reasoning behind feedback understandable. The player should also have room to explain what happened from their perspective. A conversation that only lists mistakes may identify problems without teaching the player how to recognize them independently.
Consider a hypothetical player who repeatedly moves toward the ball and crowds a teammate. Useful guidance asks why the player moved, shows how the movement affected space and explores another way to support. It does not need to label the player selfish or tactically weak. Describe the action and its consequences without turning a game moment into a character judgment.
Establish practical expectations early
Clarify the format, session length, footage requirements and what the family needs to prepare. Understand whether the offer concerns technical instruction, match discussion or another form of support. Do not assume that every service using the word mentoring includes the same work.
For Soccer Mentor, the stated format is individual online film mentoring through Google Meet, with sessions lasting 30 minutes. Families can provide match video or 10–15 clips. Packages contain a fixed number of sessions. These facts explain the service format; a conversation about the player's question is still needed to determine whether it is the right fit.
Protect the player's existing soccer relationships
An outside conversation should account for the team context. A young player may be asked to hold position, press a certain way or take risks in a particular area. Feedback that ignores those instructions can create unnecessary confusion.
When instructions are unclear, help the player formulate a question rather than encouraging them to disregard the team plan. For example: “When our fullback goes forward, where do you want me to provide cover?” A mentoring relationship can support clearer thinking while recognizing that an outside observer does not know every detail of the team's preparation.
Review usefulness over time
Set aside a moment after several conversations to ask what has changed in the player's understanding. Can they explain a recurring problem more clearly? Do they know what to look for before a decision? Are they bringing their own questions? These observations are more direct evidence of engagement than the team's latest score.
Also ask what is not working. Perhaps the clips are too difficult to follow, the focus is too broad or the schedule makes preparation stressful. Adjusting the process is reasonable. The long-term aim is a player who increasingly recognizes useful questions and possible answers, rather than becoming dependent on an adult interpretation after every match.
Questions for a useful mentoring relationship
Use these prompts to guide a coaching conversation. Adapt them to the player and team instructions.
Swipe across to view the full table →
| Area | Question to discuss | Useful evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Player need | What does the player want help understanding? | A specific game situation the player recognizes. |
| Conversation | Can the player explain and disagree respectfully? | Feedback describes actions and their context. |
| Expectations | How will preparation and follow-up work? | A clear role for the player and parent. |
| Continuity | Does the advice fit the current team role? | A shared focus that can change with the player. |
Key takeaways
- Define what the player wants help understanding before choosing a service.
- Look for respectful explanations tied to actions rather than character labels.
- Reassess the relationship as the player’s role and needs change.
Frequently asked questions
How do credentials affect the choice of mentor?
Playing and coaching experience can provide relevant context, but credentials alone do not show whether a person explains ideas well to your child. Ask how they would approach the player’s question and look for clear communication, appropriate expectations and room for the player’s voice.
Should mentoring continue all season?
That depends on the purpose, schedule and whether the player finds the conversations useful. A defined problem may need a shorter period of support, while an evolving role may create new questions. Review fit periodically rather than assuming more sessions are always better.
Can a mentor contradict the team’s instructions?
Different interpretations can arise, especially when an outside observer lacks context. Bring known team instructions into the discussion and clarify uncertainty. The player should understand how a suggestion relates to their assigned role rather than receiving competing rules without explanation.
Sources and further reading
- U.S. Soccer: Player development: Match support to individual developmental needs.